Genetically modified organism Essay Example for Free

genetically limited beingness EssayGenetically engineered f ar is an epidemic all around the world. on that point atomic number 18 accompanimentors that make these types of viandss unsuitable for many reasons. Public opinions on how genetically engineered victualss will effect the consumer market and farmers after part non afford the new seeds that are genetically altered. in that location are many cons of genetically engineered victuals that have long end point and hornswoggle term risks. Some risks have been found by scientists while separate risks are still enigmatical and will remain so unless a look forer tests for them. These nutrients have become very green in America as well as other countries.Almost every market store in the United States carries a wide array of food that has been genetically modify. Most of the genetically engineered foods in markets are not labeled to tell consumers they were altered in any way. Environmental risks are also a con cern for genetically engineered food. Different animals, including farm animals or insects can be harmed from genetically engineered food. Genetically engineered food has disconfirming effects on the human population. Genetically engineered food was first introduced into armamentelry in the earlier 1990s.Many people today do not know what kind of all-embracing research and nurture goes into making these types of foods. Sharon Palmer, a reporter, writes that genetic engineering is either Doomsday tech or biotechnology for the prox (Palmer 1). The process of altering an organism completely motleys the original organism and transforms it into something new. This new way of altering an organisms genetic makeup bypasses common breeding methods used by scientists (Genetically Modified Foods 1). The process of creating genetically altered food usually involves identifying the genes governing a desirable characteristic in one organism, and inserting them into some other in the expe ctation that the trait will be transferred (Genetically Modified Foods 1).Sometimes the process of creating these organisms does not acidify so scientists have to do the process over again until they get a transformed organism. In 1973 scientists were able to achieve using another organism as a vector which essentially was the kickoff of the development of genetically engineered foods. Although genetically engineered foods were not fully introduced until the early 1990s, they were in the process of becoming what society knows today.Newer techniques have been introduced that make it easier for gene insertion. This new method is the use of DNA bullets where microscopic metal string of beads can be coated with DNA fragments, and then fired from a miniature gun into the host cell, where DNA whitethorn integrate into the genome (Genetically Modified Foods 1). A few of the genetically engineered foods are soybeans, corn, canola, cotton, squash and melon tree (Palmer 1). at that plac e are many other foods that people see on the shelves in grocery stores that may be genetically altered but these are some main ones.Statistics show that an estimated 70 to 75 percent of all processed foods in U. S.grocery stores probably contain ingredients from GE plants (Palmer 6). Many foods have been genetically altered to make them better or resistant to herbicides. Despite the fact that scientists consider these foods to be rotatory in that respect are hidden consequences to the development of much(prenominal) organisms. The public opinion on genetically engineered food is that it is not a good improvement. Many citizens believe that the introduction of altered foods is going to have veto side effects on everything. People feel that genetically engineered foods should not be put on the market until they have had adequate testing (Current Issues 3).Many of the alterations done to food have not had extensive research conducted to find harmful effects that they might have on humans and animals. Any research that had been done usually had negative effects but scientists found a way to throw kayoed the research so that it would not go against genetically engineered food. Andrew Simms states that the evidence of harm is not evidence of the absence of harm (Simms 1). In Simms article he describes how consumers do not need genetically modified food. Scientists brought genetically engineered foods into the market and advertised them as a way to help the world.Different techniques can be used to approach the issue of world hunger. Introducing these foods to third world countries can only harm them not help them. There is a high cost of development for making genetically engineered foods. Also there is a monopoly involved with these foods. There are only a few corporations in the United States that are developing genetically altered seeds. This in turn drives up the price of the seed making it more expensive and poor farmers cannot afford to buy them (Curre nt Issues 3). Farmers have lost billions of dollars because foreign buyers do not indispensableness to buy genetically engineered foods (Kupfer 1).Many states have passed legislation against having genetically modified foods. States do not turn over that genetically engineered foods can help anything except make things worse (Kupfer 2). Foods are altered to have variant traits that would normally take a few generations to make but with genetically engineering their DNA scientists are able to do a lot more. Scientist use genetic engineering to make crops or animals drought tolerant and be able to tolerate pestiss. Consumers do not wishing crops that are mutations. They want ingrained crops and animals.Other public opinions on worldwide hunger are that GM crops will not change it. People go hungry because theyre either poor, powerless, both, or have no land to senesce food on (Simms 2). Public opinion on genetically engineered food is that they do not want it. Many factors hav e led people to choose not to accept genetically engineered foods into their lives. Genetically engineered food effects everything in a negative way. There are cons to the development and introduction of genetically engineered foods into civilization. There are many risks involved with these types of foods that are unknown to the public.Scientists try to cover up the experiments they had on genetically altered foods because they had negative outcomes. In one study scientists fed corn to rats and then checked the rats livers and kidneys, oddly males, and the study revealed adverse effects. In another study conducted on GM foods many of the mice that ate the food developed health problems or even died during the experiment (Current Issues 4). The introduction of genetically engineered foods has been linked to the rising levels of food allergies in the United States. Genetically modified foods can effect organic foods if they are processed in the same place.Allergic reactions are grea ter since genetically engineered foods have been introduced (Smith 1). There are many environmental concerns as well. Although long term impact is unknown many researchers can conclude some of the negative side effects. A few difficulties have already developed. Plants can cross-pollinate with other plants around them which may seem like a great thing but it is not. Some plants are engineered to be pest resistant which seems good but in all actuality those plants can cross-pollinate with the weeds around them which in turn makes the weeds stronger and become more resistant to herbicides.The cross-pollination of plants creates a problem for farmers who then have to overhaul additional money to buy more herbicide to kill new weeds (Current Issues 3). Another common modification is adding a gene called Bacillus thuringiensis which is a bacterium that helps that plant develop poison that kills pests such as bollworms and stem borers. This seemed like a good modification by scientists b ut in fact the plant emits these toxins into the environment and it is deadly to all insects, not just the pests. Reports have been shown that these toxins from the crops also killed a tumescent amount of butterflies (Current Issues 1).U. S. Government does not require reviews on genetically engineered foods. Genetically altered foods are not FDA regulated either. Foods are being modified without having adequate testing and then put on grocery shelves. People are eating food that they do not know whether or not it is safe. There are many other potential concerns with genetic engineering like an organisms genetic makeup, anti-nutrients, viral DNA, antibiotic drug resistant genes, absorbing genes, and allergic responses. Many genetically altered foods have been used as eat for animals as well.These animals have shown effects on body growth, changes in blood, kidney, pancreas, liver, erosion and necrosis of the gastrointestinal tract, and alterations in reproduction, development and mortality (Palmer 6). There are many unknown risks of genetically engineered foods. Unknown long term health risks have not been identified and cannot be identified until researchers conduct more research. Genetically modified foods are not something people should rely on in the future as their base food. There are risks today and also many other unknown risks.Genetically engineered food is a calamity to the human population. This creation was introduced to try and stop world hunger, make food cheaper to buy and many other reasons. These issues have not changed because of the introduction of genetically engineered food. The effects these types of foods have on humans and even animals can be harmful. Research shows that there are long term risks involved with genetically engineered foods. Potential cancers, diseases, environmental changes, and possibly a rising cost in food are all negative factors of genetically engineered food.Genetically engineered foods should be eliminated fro m people and animals diets. Works Cited Genetically Modified Food. Current Issues Macmillian affable Science Library. Detroit Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 27 Nov. 2011. Genetically Modified Foods. The Hutchinson Unabridged Encyclopedia with Atlas and tolerate guide. Abington Helicon, 2010. Credo Reference. Web. 05 November 2011. Kupfer, David. Genetically Modified Food Damages Trade with Other Nations. Genetically Modified Food. Diane Andrews Henningfeld, Ed. At Issue Series. Greenhaven Press, 2009.David Kupfer, The Genetic Resistance Mendocino Is the First GMO-free County in the Nation, and I am Sure It Will non Be the Last, Earth Island Journal, vol. 19, summer 2004, pp. 42-44. Copyright 2004 Earth Island Institute. Reproduced by permission. Palmer, Sharon, and Chris McCullum-Gomez. Genetically Engineered Foods Update.. (Cover Story). Environmental Nutrition 33. 7 (2010) I-6. Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition. Web. 5 Nov. 2011. Simms, Andrew. G enetically Modified Food Will not Ease World Hunger. Social Justice. David Haugen, Susan Musser, and Vickey Kalambakal, Eds.Opposing Viewpoints Series. Greenhaven Press, 2010 Andrew Simms, World Hunger Needs a Simple resultant Rather Than Hi-Tech GM Food, Guardian, (UK), August 4, 2003. Copyright 2003 Guardian Newspapers Limited. Reproduced by permission of the author Smith, Jeffrey M. Genetically Modified Foods May sheath Allergic Responses. Food Safety. Judeen Bartos, Ed. At Issue Series. Greenhaven Press, 2011. Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetically Engineered Foods May Cause Rising Food Allergies, Institute for Responsible Technology, May 2007. Copyright 2007 by Virago. Reproduced by permission by Time Warner Books UK.