World history. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto Essay

origination history. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto - Essay ExampleIn the Manifesto, Marx and Engels check made an effort to evaluate the history of human hostelry jibe to the mode of production and wear out. They argue that modern society is based on the latest mode of production. Meanwhile, they further envisage that, according to the mode of production, socialism (or communism) is next to Capitalism which is supposed to exploit labor by modify from the production. In fact, the political dimension of communism is essentially the result of its response to the capitalists exploitation. Marx and Engels argue that the proletariats (or working bod people) should unite themselves to accelerate the transition of human society from capitalism to socialism. But though Marx and Engels judgment of class struggle is persuasive enough to explain the changes human societys activities, these authors throw away failed to guess that a theory which is, indeed, meant for exp laining the economic changes in human society, is not sufficient to bring a organic political change in a country or a society. At best, a theory, worry Marxism, can predict the oncoming changes in a society but in that location must be exception. In the preface of Communist Manifesto, Engels claims that the text is essentially Marxs work and that the basic thought... belongs solely and solo to Marx (Marx and Engels 23). In fact, Marxs theory of class-conflict constitutes the premise of the Manifesto. Dep intercepting on the Class-struggle theory, Marx explores the heart of Capitalism. In the very commencement ceremony of Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels claim that human history is basically the history of class struggles (Marx and Engels 34). They argue that there argon generally two conflicting parties in this struggle. This conflict is determined of the mode of labor, which is, indeed, a consanguinity among the laborer and the production. In this regard, these authors assert that Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another (Marx and Engels 43). They further argue that this class war always ends all in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes (Marx and Engels 43). concord their claim, capitalism is the penultimate stage, of human society, which itself has resulted from the dissolution of the former feudalist social monastic order through the conflict between the feudal lords and their subjects. Even the struggle between the bourgeois class and the proletariats will dissolve the capitalist society into a classless society where class-conflict will not exist. In the first chapter of the Manifesto, Marx and Engels say that in a capitalist society, the bourgeoisies are amorally profit-oriented they maneuver both social and political institutions in order to exploit the proletariats labor and to accumulate wealth, as Marx and Engels note in this regard, The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations...for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation (Marx and Engels 67). It is evident that Marx and Engels have successfully explored the heart of a societys economic system and its role in as a determinant sociopolitical power structure in a society. Yet some of Marx and Engelss claims are quite problematic. They take it for granted that the proletariats are exploited and the bourgeoisies are the exploiting owners of a capitalist soci